Use case

Get an Independent Second Opinion on Any PR

Submit a diff or a set of files to Codemind's review_code tool and get back an independent review from two separate LLM judge passes — one for general correctness and security, one dedicated to silent-failure patterns. Not scoped to Codemind-generated code — review anything, from any author or tool.

Quickstart See the capabilities
How it works

Two independent judges, filtered before you see it

Two independent passes

A general correctness/security judge and a dedicated silent-failure judge review your submission separately. Findings are merged and deduplicated, not run through a single model's blind spots.

Filtered before you see it

An anti-hallucination filter drops findings that cite files you never submitted and downgrades fabricated identifier claims — you don't get flagged for bugs that don't exist.

Works on any code

Submit files or a diff. Not scoped to code Codemind generated — review a PR from any author, any tool, any codebase.

Never silently degrades

If one of the two review passes fails, the result says so explicitly — never a silent report of full coverage over a half-covered review.